ruby-on-rails – has_many通过关联依赖的破坏在谁叫做破坏的条件下

有没有办法在before_destroy钩子中检查哪个对象(类)被称为destroy?

在下面的例子中,当一个病人被摧毁时,他们的约会也是如此(这就是我想要的);但是,如果有任何与该医生相关的预约,我不想让医生被销毁.

再次,有没有办法在before_destory回调中进行这样的检查?如果没有,是否还有其他方法可以根据通话的“方向”(即根据谁打电话)完成“破坏检查”?

class Physician < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :appointments,dependent: :destroy
  has_many :patients,through: :appointments
end


class Patient < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :appointments,dependent: :destroy
  has_many :physicians,through: :appointments
end


class Appointment < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :patient
  belongs_to :physician

  before_destroy :ensure_not_referenced_by_anything_important

  private

  def ensure_not_referenced_by_anything_important
    unless patients.empty?
      errors.add(:base,'This physician cannot be deleted because appointments exist.')
      false
    end
  end
end

解决方法

说啊:
class Physician < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :appointments,dependent: :restrict_with_exception
  has_many :patients,through: :appointments
end

请注意dependent :: restrict_with_exception.这将导致Active Record拒绝销毁任何具有相关约会记录的医生记录.

the API docsthe association basics guide.

相关文章

validates:conclusion,:presence=>true,:inclusion=>{...
一、redis集群搭建redis3.0以前,提供了Sentinel工具来监控各...
分享一下我老师大神的人工智能教程。零基础!通俗易懂!风趣...
上一篇博文 ruby传参之引用类型 里边定义了一个方法名 mo...
一编程与编程语言 什么是编程语言? 能够被计算机所识别的表...
Ruby类和对象Ruby是一种完美的面向对象编程语言。面向对象编...