domain-name-system – 我是否需要保留SPF TXT记录以实现向后兼容?

一个专用的DNS SPF记录,可用于SPF记录.但是,DNS TXT记录也可用于向后兼容.

如果我可以定义SPF记录 – 我应该删除已弃用的TXT记录还是留下它?

解决方法

实际上在 RFC 7208,section 3.1.之后你应该只使用TXT类型记录:

SPF records MUST be published as a DNS TXT (type 16) Resource Record
(RR) [RFC1035] only. The character content of the record is encoded
as [US-ASCII]. Use of alternative DNS RR types was supported in
SPF’s experimental phase but has been discontinued.

SPFBR工作组已于2014年4月弃用SPF RR类型.对此的推理也可以在RFC 7208,section 3.1.中找到,其中淘汰了旧的RFC 4408

In 2003,when SPF was first being developed,the requirements for assignment of a new DNS RR type were considerably more stringent than they are Now. Additionally,support for easy deployment of new DNS RR types was not widely deployed in DNS servers and provisioning systems. As a result,developers of SPF found it easier and more practical to use the TXT RR type for SPF records.

相关文章

vue阻止冒泡事件 阻止点击事件的执行 <div @click=&a...
尝试过使用网友说的API接口获取 找到的都是失效了 暂时就使用...
后台我拿的数据是这样的格式: [ {id:1 , parentId: 0, name:...
JAVA下载文件防重复点击,防止多次下载请求,Cookie方式快速简...
Mip是什么意思以及作用有哪些