如何在此PostgreSQL查询中阻止全表扫描？ EXPLAIN ANALYZE EXPLAIN

编程问答 2022-08-15

问题描述

此查询是使用PostgreSQL 11（最新）顶部的Django ORM构造的。此处的PostgreSQL在docker容器中运行。在生产中，我们使用Cloud SQL，查询时间虽然更快，但总体上却很慢。

更新：查询和EXPLAIN ANALYZE也可在此处使用：https://explain.depesz.com/s/yQE7

我已在所有ID列上建立索引，因此EXPLAIN在orders_query上显示了过长的全表扫描时，我感到很惊讶。长期运行的代码位于EXPLAIN日志的最顶部，但这是相关部分（最顶部的行）：

GroupAggregate  (cost=999695.25..19231670646.03 rows=1897315 width=105)
  Group Key: users_profile.id,users_user.last_login
  ->  Sort  (cost=999695.25..1007470.17 rows=3109968 width=73)
        Sort Key: users_profile.id,users_user.last_login
        ->  Hash Right Join  (cost=738.71..387928.02 rows=3109968 width=73)
              Hash Cond: (orders_query.user_id = users_user.id)
              ->  Seq Scan on orders_query  (cost=0.00..345054.24 rows=2943324 width=8)
              ->  Hash  (cost=702.78..702.78 rows=2874 width=73)
                    ->  Hash Right Join  (cost=301.35..702.78 rows=2874 width=73)

问题：我是否可以制定另一个索引来避免此Seq Scan减慢SQL查询的速度？

 SELECT "users_profile"."id","users_profile"."created","users_profile"."modified","users_profile"."guid","users_profile"."user_id","users_profile"."charter_role_id","users_profile"."owner_id","users_profile"."volume_limit","users_profile"."vol_limit_ovrd","users_profile"."charter_vol_limit_contrib_ovrd","users_profile"."sponsored_ovrd","users_profile"."view_peers_ovrd","users_profile"."inherit_permits",Count(DISTINCT "orders_order"."id") AS "orders",(SELECT Count(DISTINCT U0."guid") AS "io"
        FROM   "orders_order" U0
               INNER JOIN "users_user" U1
                       ON ( U0."user_id" = U1."id" )
               INNER JOIN "users_profile" U2
                       ON ( U1."id" = U2."user_id" )
        WHERE  U2."owner_id" = "users_profile"."id"
        GROUP  BY U2."owner_id")           AS "indirect_orders",Count(DISTINCT "orders_query"."id") AS "searches",(SELECT Count(DISTINCT U0."guid") AS "isch"
        FROM   "orders_query" U0
               INNER JOIN "users_user" U1
                       ON ( U0."user_id" = U1."id" )
               INNER JOIN "users_profile" U2
                       ON ( U1."id" = U2."user_id" )
        WHERE  U2."owner_id" = "users_profile"."id"
        GROUP  BY U2."owner_id")           AS "indirect_searches",(SELECT Count(DISTINCT U0."guid") AS "sg"
        FROM   "users_profile" U0
        WHERE  U0."owner_id" = "users_profile"."id"
        GROUP  BY U0."owner_id")           AS "signups","users_user"."last_login"           AS "last_activity"
FROM   "users_profile"
       INNER JOIN "users_user"
               ON ( "users_profile"."user_id" = "users_user"."id" )
       LEFT OUTER JOIN "orders_order"
                    ON ( "users_user"."id" = "orders_order"."user_id" )
       LEFT OUTER JOIN "orders_query"
                    ON ( "users_user"."id" = "orders_query"."user_id" )
GROUP  BY "users_profile"."id","users_user"."last_login"

EXPLAIN ANALYZE 

EXPLAIN ANALYZE

GroupAggregate  (cost=999695.25..19231670646.03 rows=1897315 width=105) (actual time=682829.362..1112031.341 rows=1057 loops=1)
"  Group Key: users_profile.id,users_user.last_login"
  ->  Sort  (cost=999695.25..1007470.17 rows=3109968 width=73) (actual time=682711.948..768155.952 rows=222437142 loops=1)
"        Sort Key: users_profile.id,users_user.last_login"
        Sort Method: external merge  Disk: 18873640kB
        ->  Hash Right Join  (cost=738.71..387928.02 rows=3109968 width=73) (actual time=12.263..115509.811 rows=222437142 loops=1)
              Hash Cond: (orders_query.user_id = users_user.id)
              ->  Seq Scan on orders_query  (cost=0.00..345054.24 rows=2943324 width=8) (actual time=0.024..6992.146 rows=2945348 loops=1)
              ->  Hash  (cost=702.78..702.78 rows=2874 width=73) (actual time=12.203..12.203 rows=3456 loops=1)
                    Buckets: 4096  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 409kB
                    ->  Hash Right Join  (cost=301.35..702.78 rows=2874 width=73) (actual time=3.807..10.194 rows=3456 loops=1)
                          Hash Cond: (orders_order.user_id = users_user.id)
                          ->  Seq Scan on orders_order  (cost=0.00..344.96 rows=7396 width=8) (actual time=0.009..1.771 rows=7396 loops=1)
                          ->  Hash  (cost=288.13..288.13 rows=1057 width=69) (actual time=3.762..3.762 rows=1057 loops=1)
                                Buckets: 2048  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 128kB
                                ->  Hash Join  (cost=36.78..288.13 rows=1057 width=69) (actual time=1.137..3.169 rows=1057 loops=1)
                                      Hash Cond: (users_user.id = users_profile.user_id)
                                      ->  Seq Scan on users_user  (cost=0.00..244.20 rows=2720 width=12) (actual time=0.014..0.610 rows=2720 loops=1)
                                      ->  Hash  (cost=23.57..23.57 rows=1057 width=57) (actual time=1.022..1.174 rows=1057 loops=1)
                                            Buckets: 2048  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 113kB
                                            ->  Seq Scan on users_profile  (cost=0.00..23.57 rows=1057 width=57) (actual time=0.008..0.504 rows=1057 loops=1)
  SubPlan 1
    ->  GroupAggregate  (cost=4.96..87.25 rows=14 width=12) (actual time=0.016..0.016 rows=0 loops=1057)
          Group Key: u2.owner_id
          ->  Nested Loop  (cost=4.96..86.89 rows=44 width=20) (actual time=0.008..0.013 rows=2 loops=1057)
                ->  Nested Loop  (cost=4.68..71.05 rows=16 width=12) (actual time=0.005..0.008 rows=1 loops=1057)
                      ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on users_profile u2  (cost=4.40..18.29 rows=16 width=8) (actual time=0.003..0.004 rows=1 loops=1057)
                            Recheck Cond: (owner_id = users_profile.id)
                            Heap Blocks: exact=300
                            ->  Bitmap Index Scan on users_profile_owner_id_a9029da4  (cost=0.00..4.40 rows=16 width=0) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=1057)
                                  Index Cond: (owner_id = users_profile.id)
                      ->  Index Only Scan using users_user_pkey on users_user u1  (cost=0.28..3.30 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=1037)
                            Index Cond: (id = u2.user_id)
                            Heap Fetches: 0
                ->  Index Scan using orders_order_user_id_e9b59eb1 on orders_order u0  (cost=0.28..0.89 rows=10 width=20) (actual time=0.003..0.004 rows=2 loops=1037)
                      Index Cond: (user_id = u1.id)
  SubPlan 2
    ->  GroupAggregate  (cost=0.99..10029.94 rows=14 width=12) (actual time=5.109..5.109 rows=0 loops=1057)
          Group Key: u2_1.owner_id
          ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.99..9943.23 rows=17314 width=20) (actual time=0.197..4.366 rows=858 loops=1057)
                ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.56..110.20 rows=16 width=12) (actual time=0.182..0.196 rows=1 loops=1057)
                      ->  Index Scan using users_profile_user_id_key on users_profile u2_1  (cost=0.28..57.44 rows=16 width=8) (actual time=0.182..0.192 rows=1 loops=1057)
                            Filter: (owner_id = users_profile.id)
                            Rows Removed by Filter: 1056
                      ->  Index Only Scan using users_user_pkey on users_user u1_1  (cost=0.28..3.30 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=1037)
                            Index Cond: (id = u2_1.user_id)
                            Heap Fetches: 0
                ->  Index Scan using orders_query_user_id_a0b49874 on orders_query u0_1  (cost=0.43..564.34 rows=5022 width=20) (actual time=0.038..4.010 rows=874 loops=1037)
                      Index Cond: (user_id = u1_1.id)
  SubPlan 3
    ->  GroupAggregate  (cost=4.40..18.51 rows=14 width=12) (actual time=0.005..0.005 rows=0 loops=1057)
          Group Key: u0_2.owner_id
          ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on users_profile u0_2  (cost=4.40..18.29 rows=16 width=20) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=1057)
                Recheck Cond: (owner_id = users_profile.id)
                Heap Blocks: exact=300
                ->  Bitmap Index Scan on users_profile_owner_id_a9029da4  (cost=0.00..4.40 rows=16 width=0) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=1 loops=1057)
                      Index Cond: (owner_id = users_profile.id)
Planning Time: 4.279 ms
Execution Time: 1112994.119 ms

EXPLAIN 

GroupAggregate  (cost=999695.25..19231670646.03 rows=1897315 width=105)
  Group Key: users_profile.id,users_user.last_login
        ->  Hash Right Join  (cost=738.71..387928.02 rows=3109968 width=73)
              Hash Cond: (orders_query.user_id = users_user.id)
              ->  Seq Scan on orders_query  (cost=0.00..345054.24 rows=2943324 width=8)
              ->  Hash  (cost=702.78..702.78 rows=2874 width=73)
                    ->  Hash Right Join  (cost=301.35..702.78 rows=2874 width=73)
                          Hash Cond: (orders_order.user_id = users_user.id)
                          ->  Seq Scan on orders_order  (cost=0.00..344.96 rows=7396 width=8)
                          ->  Hash  (cost=288.13..288.13 rows=1057 width=69)
                                ->  Hash Join  (cost=36.78..288.13 rows=1057 width=69)
                                      Hash Cond: (users_user.id = users_profile.user_id)
                                      ->  Seq Scan on users_user  (cost=0.00..244.20 rows=2720 width=12)
                                      ->  Hash  (cost=23.57..23.57 rows=1057 width=57)
                                            ->  Seq Scan on users_profile  (cost=0.00..23.57 rows=1057 width=57)
  SubPlan 1
    ->  GroupAggregate  (cost=4.96..87.25 rows=14 width=12)
          Group Key: u2.owner_id
          ->  Nested Loop  (cost=4.96..86.89 rows=44 width=20)
                ->  Nested Loop  (cost=4.68..71.05 rows=16 width=12)
                      ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on users_profile u2  (cost=4.40..18.29 rows=16 width=8)
                            Recheck Cond: (owner_id = users_profile.id)
                            ->  Bitmap Index Scan on users_profile_owner_id_a9029da4  (cost=0.00..4.40 rows=16 width=0)
                                  Index Cond: (owner_id = users_profile.id)
                      ->  Index Only Scan using users_user_pkey on users_user u1  (cost=0.28..3.30 rows=1 width=4)
                            Index Cond: (id = u2.user_id)
                ->  Index Scan using orders_order_user_id_e9b59eb1 on orders_order u0  (cost=0.28..0.89 rows=10 width=20)
                      Index Cond: (user_id = u1.id)
  SubPlan 2
    ->  GroupAggregate  (cost=0.99..10029.94 rows=14 width=12)
          Group Key: u2_1.owner_id
          ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.99..9943.23 rows=17314 width=20)
                ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.56..110.20 rows=16 width=12)
                      ->  Index Scan using users_profile_user_id_key on users_profile u2_1  (cost=0.28..57.44 rows=16 width=8)
                            Filter: (owner_id = users_profile.id)
                      ->  Index Only Scan using users_user_pkey on users_user u1_1  (cost=0.28..3.30 rows=1 width=4)
                            Index Cond: (id = u2_1.user_id)
                ->  Index Scan using orders_query_user_id_a0b49874 on orders_query u0_1  (cost=0.43..564.34 rows=5022 width=20)
                      Index Cond: (user_id = u1_1.id)
  SubPlan 3
    ->  GroupAggregate  (cost=4.40..18.51 rows=14 width=12)
          Group Key: u0_2.owner_id
          ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on users_profile u0_2  (cost=4.40..18.29 rows=16 width=20)
                Recheck Cond: (owner_id = users_profile.id)
                ->  Bitmap Index Scan on users_profile_owner_id_a9029da4  (cost=0.00..4.40 rows=16 width=0)
                      Index Cond: (owner_id = users_profile.id)

解决方法

在我看来，您正在将用户的每个“ orders_order”与每个用户的“ orders_query”结合在一起，结果产生的行太多（2亿），因此需要按该组对行进行排序，这需要很长时间。

尝试以与“ indirect_orders”和“ indirect_searches”相同的方式为“ orders”和“ searches”编写子查询，以便可以删除这两个左外部联接。

djangopostgresql-performance

相关问答

导入项目后报错问题
依赖报错 idea导入项目后依赖报错，解决方案：https://blog....
idea不能识别yaml文件
使用mybatis plus常见错误
错误1：代码生成器依赖和mybatis依赖冲突 启动项目时报错如下...
gradle常见问题与错误
错误1：gradle项目控制台输出为乱码 # 解决方案：https://bl...
Mybatis Plus传入参数0不起作用
错误还原：在查询的过程中，传入的workType为0时，该条件不起...
linux中make编译源码包失败
报错如下，gcc版本太低 ^ server.c:5346:31: 错误：‘struct...