c – 课堂成员的范围

在以下示例中,阵列v的大小是否保证为2或3?
static const int i = 3;

class X {

    char v[i];
    static const int i = 2;
};

从标准来看,

3.3.6/2 A name N used in a class S shall refer to the same declaration in its context and when re-evaluated in the completed scope of S

我认为这意味着’我’将是2,重新评估的东西在这里意味着什么?

解决方法

正确的行为是它应该导致错误,因为重新评估会改变含义:

3.3.6节中的示例:

The potential scope of a declaration that extends to or past the end of a class deFinition also extends to the regions defined by its member deFinitions,even if the members are defined lexically outside the class (this includes static data member deFinitions,nested class deFinitions,member function deFinitions (including the member function body and,for constructor functions (12.1),the ctor-initializer (12.6.2)) and any portion of the declarator part of such deFinitions which follows the identifier,including a parameter-declaration-clause and any default arguments (8.3.6). [Example:

该示例与您的示例类似(使用枚举而不是静态const int):

typedef int  c;
enum { i = 1 };
class X {
    char  v[i];    // error: i refers to ::i
                   // but when reevaluated is X::i
    int  f() { return sizeof(c); } // OK X::c
    char  c;
    enum { i = 2 };
};

在遇到v [i]时,编译器只知道enum {i = 1}; (或静态const int i = 3;,但是当已知完整类声明时,char v [i]会有所不同,因为我将被重新评估为2.

相关文章

本程序的编译和运行环境如下(如果有运行方面的问题欢迎在评...
水了一学期的院选修,万万没想到期末考试还有比较硬核的编程...
补充一下,先前文章末尾给出的下载链接的完整代码含有部分C&...
思路如标题所说采用模N取余法,难点是这个除法过程如何实现。...
本篇博客有更新!!!更新后效果图如下: 文章末尾的完整代码...
刚开始学习模块化程序设计时,估计大家都被形参和实参搞迷糊...